Head-to-Head Analysis

Gary’s Quick steak vs Uncured black forest ham ultra thin deli slices

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Gary’s Quick steak

Gary’s Quick steak

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Uncured black forest ham ultra thin deli slices

Uncured black forest ham ultra thin deli slices

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
151.8 kcal
Energy
107 kcal
0g
Sugars
1.8g
7.1g
Fat
3.6g
20.5g
Protein
16.1g
0.1g
Salt
2.4g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Gary’s Quick steak and Uncured black forest ham ultra thin deli slices side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Gary’s Quick steak is the more energy-dense option here, packing 45 more calories per 100g than Uncured black forest ham ultra thin deli slices. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Gary’s Quick steak takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Uncured black forest ham ultra thin deli slices contains 1.79g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Gary’s Quick steak offers a protein boost with 20.535714285714g per 100g, outperforming Uncured black forest ham ultra thin deli slices in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Gary’s Quick steak or Uncured black forest ham ultra thin deli slices?

It depends on your goals. Gary’s Quick steak has 151.78571428571 calories, while Uncured black forest ham ultra thin deli slices has 107 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Gary’s Quick steak vegan?

No, Gary’s Quick steak is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Gary’s Quick steak and Uncured black forest ham ultra thin deli slices?

There is a difference of 45 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.