Head-to-Head Analysis

Gentle Teething Wafers Strawberry Apple Spinach vs Apple, Banana & Kale

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Gentle Teething Wafers Strawberry Apple Spinach

Gentle Teething Wafers Strawberry Apple Spinach

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Apple, Banana & Kale

Apple, Banana & Kale

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
375 kcal
Energy
53.1 kcal
12.5g
Sugars
9.7g
0g
Fat
0g
0g
Protein
0.9g
0.2g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Gentle Teething Wafers Strawberry Apple Spinach and Apple, Banana & Kale side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Gentle Teething Wafers Strawberry Apple Spinach is the more energy-dense option here, packing 322 more calories per 100g than Apple, Banana & Kale. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Gentle Teething Wafers Strawberry Apple Spinach contains significantly more sugar (12.5g) compared to the milder Apple, Banana & Kale (9.7345132743363g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Apple, Banana & Kale is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Gentle Teething Wafers Strawberry Apple Spinach or Apple, Banana & Kale?

It depends on your goals. Gentle Teething Wafers Strawberry Apple Spinach has 375 calories, while Apple, Banana & Kale has 53.097345132743 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Gentle Teething Wafers Strawberry Apple Spinach vegan?

No, Gentle Teething Wafers Strawberry Apple Spinach is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Gentle Teething Wafers Strawberry Apple Spinach and Apple, Banana & Kale?

There is a difference of 322 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.