Head-to-Head Analysis

GFuel Peach Rings vs Original CocunutMilk

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of GFuel Peach Rings

GFuel Peach Rings

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Original CocunutMilk

Original CocunutMilk

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
214.3 kcal
Energy
35.3 kcal
0g
Sugars
2.7g
0g
Fat
2.2g
0g
Protein
0.4g
0.9g
Salt
0.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing GFuel Peach Rings and Original CocunutMilk side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

GFuel Peach Rings is the more energy-dense option here, packing 179 more calories per 100g than Original CocunutMilk. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, GFuel Peach Rings takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Original CocunutMilk contains 2.65g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: GFuel Peach Rings or Original CocunutMilk?

It depends on your goals. GFuel Peach Rings has 214.28571428571 calories, while Original CocunutMilk has 35.3 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is GFuel Peach Rings vegan?

No, GFuel Peach Rings is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between GFuel Peach Rings and Original CocunutMilk?

There is a difference of 179 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.