Head-to-Head Analysis

Ginger Dressing vs Diced Fire Roasted Tomatoes With Seasoning

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Ginger Dressing

Ginger Dressing

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Diced Fire Roasted Tomatoes With Seasoning

Diced Fire Roasted Tomatoes With Seasoning

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
778 kcal
Energy
21.9 kcal
38.2g
Sugars
3.4g
63.8g
Fat
0.3g
12.7g
Protein
0.7g
0g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Ginger Dressing and Diced Fire Roasted Tomatoes With Seasoning side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Ginger Dressing is the more energy-dense option here, packing 756 more calories per 100g than Diced Fire Roasted Tomatoes With Seasoning. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Ginger Dressing contains significantly more sugar (38.2g) compared to the milder Diced Fire Roasted Tomatoes With Seasoning (3.41g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Diced Fire Roasted Tomatoes With Seasoning is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Ginger Dressing offers a protein boost with 12.7g per 100g, outperforming Diced Fire Roasted Tomatoes With Seasoning in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Ginger Dressing or Diced Fire Roasted Tomatoes With Seasoning?

It depends on your goals. Ginger Dressing has 778 calories, while Diced Fire Roasted Tomatoes With Seasoning has 21.9 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Ginger Dressing vegan?

No, Ginger Dressing is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Ginger Dressing and Diced Fire Roasted Tomatoes With Seasoning?

There is a difference of 756 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.