Head-to-Head Analysis

Ginger zinger trail mix vs Lightly Sweet & Salty Kettle Corn

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Ginger zinger trail mix

Ginger zinger trail mix

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Lightly Sweet & Salty Kettle Corn

Lightly Sweet & Salty Kettle Corn

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
516 kcal
Energy
429 kcal
35.5g
Sugars
17.9g
35.5g
Fat
14.3g
9.7g
Protein
7.1g
0.1g
Salt
1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Ginger zinger trail mix and Lightly Sweet & Salty Kettle Corn side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Ginger zinger trail mix is the more energy-dense option here, packing 87 more calories per 100g than Lightly Sweet & Salty Kettle Corn. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Ginger zinger trail mix contains significantly more sugar (35.48g) compared to the milder Lightly Sweet & Salty Kettle Corn (17.86g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Lightly Sweet & Salty Kettle Corn is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Ginger zinger trail mix offers a protein boost with 9.68g per 100g, outperforming Lightly Sweet & Salty Kettle Corn in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Ginger zinger trail mix or Lightly Sweet & Salty Kettle Corn?

It depends on your goals. Ginger zinger trail mix has 516 calories, while Lightly Sweet & Salty Kettle Corn has 429 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Ginger zinger trail mix vegan?

No, Ginger zinger trail mix is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Ginger zinger trail mix and Lightly Sweet & Salty Kettle Corn?

There is a difference of 87 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.