Head-to-Head Analysis

Gluten free chocolate fudge brownie mix vs Apple Cinnamon Fruit on the Go

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Gluten free chocolate fudge brownie mix

Gluten free chocolate fudge brownie mix

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Apple Cinnamon Fruit on the Go

Apple Cinnamon Fruit on the Go

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
370.4 kcal
Energy
86.4 kcal
55.6g
Sugars
0g
1.9g
Fat
0g
1.9g
Protein
0g
0.6g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Gluten free chocolate fudge brownie mix and Apple Cinnamon Fruit on the Go side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Gluten free chocolate fudge brownie mix is the more energy-dense option here, packing 284 more calories per 100g than Apple Cinnamon Fruit on the Go. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Gluten free chocolate fudge brownie mix contains significantly more sugar (55.555555555556g) compared to the milder Apple Cinnamon Fruit on the Go (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Apple Cinnamon Fruit on the Go is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Gluten free chocolate fudge brownie mix or Apple Cinnamon Fruit on the Go?

It depends on your goals. Gluten free chocolate fudge brownie mix has 370.37037037037 calories, while Apple Cinnamon Fruit on the Go has 86.4 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Gluten free chocolate fudge brownie mix vegan?

No, Gluten free chocolate fudge brownie mix is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Gluten free chocolate fudge brownie mix and Apple Cinnamon Fruit on the Go?

There is a difference of 284 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.