Head-to-Head Analysis

Gluten Free Everything Thins vs Salt & vinegar flavored whole roasted almonds

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Gluten Free Everything Thins

Gluten Free Everything Thins

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Salt & vinegar flavored whole roasted almonds

Salt & vinegar flavored whole roasted almonds

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
467 kcal
Energy
180 kcal
6.7g
Sugars
1g
23.3g
Fat
16g
6.7g
Protein
6g
2.5g
Salt
0.7g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Gluten Free Everything Thins and Salt & vinegar flavored whole roasted almonds side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Gluten Free Everything Thins is the more energy-dense option here, packing 287 more calories per 100g than Salt & vinegar flavored whole roasted almonds. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Gluten Free Everything Thins contains significantly more sugar (6.67g) compared to the milder Salt & vinegar flavored whole roasted almonds (1g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Salt & vinegar flavored whole roasted almonds is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Gluten Free Everything Thins or Salt & vinegar flavored whole roasted almonds?

It depends on your goals. Gluten Free Everything Thins has 467 calories, while Salt & vinegar flavored whole roasted almonds has 180 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Gluten Free Everything Thins vegan?

No, Gluten Free Everything Thins is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Gluten Free Everything Thins and Salt & vinegar flavored whole roasted almonds?

There is a difference of 287 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.