Head-to-Head Analysis

Gluten Free Graham Style Cookies Coated In Dark Chocolate vs Salted Toffee 55% Dark Chocolate

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Gluten Free Graham Style Cookies Coated In Dark Chocolate

Gluten Free Graham Style Cookies Coated In Dark Chocolate

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Salted Toffee 55% Dark Chocolate

Salted Toffee 55% Dark Chocolate

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
526.3 kcal
Energy
571 kcal
29g
Sugars
42.9g
26.3g
Fat
35.7g
7.9g
Protein
7.1g
0.7g
Salt
0.6g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Gluten Free Graham Style Cookies Coated In Dark Chocolate and Salted Toffee 55% Dark Chocolate side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Gluten Free Graham Style Cookies Coated In Dark Chocolate is the clear winner. With 45 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Gluten Free Graham Style Cookies Coated In Dark Chocolate takes the lead with only 28.95g of sugar per 100g, whereas Salted Toffee 55% Dark Chocolate contains 42.9g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Gluten Free Graham Style Cookies Coated In Dark Chocolate or Salted Toffee 55% Dark Chocolate?

Gluten Free Graham Style Cookies Coated In Dark Chocolate appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Gluten Free Graham Style Cookies Coated In Dark Chocolate vegan?

No, Gluten Free Graham Style Cookies Coated In Dark Chocolate is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Gluten Free Graham Style Cookies Coated In Dark Chocolate and Salted Toffee 55% Dark Chocolate?

There is a difference of 45 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.