Head-to-Head Analysis

Gluten free sea salt rice & almond thin crackers vs Party Wafers Strawberry

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Gluten free sea salt rice & almond thin crackers

Gluten free sea salt rice & almond thin crackers

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Party Wafers Strawberry

Party Wafers Strawberry

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
433 kcal
Energy
516.1 kcal
0g
Sugars
29g
8.3g
Fat
25.8g
6.7g
Protein
3.2g
1.4g
Salt
0.4g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Gluten free sea salt rice & almond thin crackers and Party Wafers Strawberry side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Gluten free sea salt rice & almond thin crackers is the clear winner. With 83 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Gluten free sea salt rice & almond thin crackers takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Party Wafers Strawberry contains 29.032258064516g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Gluten free sea salt rice & almond thin crackers offers a protein boost with 6.67g per 100g, outperforming Party Wafers Strawberry in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Gluten free sea salt rice & almond thin crackers or Party Wafers Strawberry?

Gluten free sea salt rice & almond thin crackers appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Gluten free sea salt rice & almond thin crackers vegan?

No, Gluten free sea salt rice & almond thin crackers is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Gluten free sea salt rice & almond thin crackers and Party Wafers Strawberry?

There is a difference of 83 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.