Head-to-Head Analysis

Gluten Free Seven Grain vs Maeda en matcha booster unsweetened

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Gluten Free Seven Grain

Gluten Free Seven Grain

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Maeda en matcha booster unsweetened

Maeda en matcha booster unsweetened

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
219.5 kcal
Energy
333.3 kcal
2.4g
Sugars
0g
3.7g
Fat
0g
4.9g
Protein
0g
0.9g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Gluten Free Seven Grain and Maeda en matcha booster unsweetened side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Gluten Free Seven Grain is the clear winner. With 114 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Gluten Free Seven Grain contains significantly more sugar (2.4390243902439g) compared to the milder Maeda en matcha booster unsweetened (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Maeda en matcha booster unsweetened is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Gluten Free Seven Grain offers a protein boost with 4.8780487804878g per 100g, outperforming Maeda en matcha booster unsweetened in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Gluten Free Seven Grain or Maeda en matcha booster unsweetened?

It depends on your goals. Gluten Free Seven Grain has 219.512195121951 calories, while Maeda en matcha booster unsweetened has 333.33333333333 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Gluten Free Seven Grain vegan?

No, Gluten Free Seven Grain is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Gluten Free Seven Grain and Maeda en matcha booster unsweetened?

There is a difference of 114 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.