Head-to-Head Analysis

Glutino, premium squares gluten free table cracker, original vs Ahold peanuts dry honey roasted

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Glutino, premium squares gluten free table cracker, original

Glutino, premium squares gluten free table cracker, original

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Ahold peanuts dry honey roasted

Ahold peanuts dry honey roasted

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
455 kcal
Energy
556 kcal
3g
Sugars
14.8g
21.2g
Fat
44.4g
3g
Protein
22.2g
1.9g
Salt
0.6g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Glutino, premium squares gluten free table cracker, original and Ahold peanuts dry honey roasted side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Glutino, premium squares gluten free table cracker, original is the clear winner. With 101 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Glutino, premium squares gluten free table cracker, original takes the lead with only 3.03g of sugar per 100g, whereas Ahold peanuts dry honey roasted contains 14.8g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Glutino, premium squares gluten free table cracker, original or Ahold peanuts dry honey roasted?

Glutino, premium squares gluten free table cracker, original appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Glutino, premium squares gluten free table cracker, original vegan?

No, Glutino, premium squares gluten free table cracker, original is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Glutino, premium squares gluten free table cracker, original and Ahold peanuts dry honey roasted?

There is a difference of 101 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.