Head-to-Head Analysis

Good & gather colby jack classic shredded colby vs Low fat yogurt

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Good & gather colby jack classic shredded colby

Good & gather colby jack classic shredded colby

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Low fat yogurt

Low fat yogurt

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
392.9 kcal
Energy
80.4 kcal
0g
Sugars
8.9g
28.6g
Fat
0.9g
25g
Protein
3.6g
1.4g
Salt
0.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Good & gather colby jack classic shredded colby and Low fat yogurt side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Good & gather colby jack classic shredded colby is the more energy-dense option here, packing 312 more calories per 100g than Low fat yogurt. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Good & gather colby jack classic shredded colby takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Low fat yogurt contains 8.93g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Good & gather colby jack classic shredded colby offers a protein boost with 25g per 100g, outperforming Low fat yogurt in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Good & gather colby jack classic shredded colby or Low fat yogurt?

It depends on your goals. Good & gather colby jack classic shredded colby has 392.85714285714 calories, while Low fat yogurt has 80.4 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Good & gather colby jack classic shredded colby vegan?

No, Good & gather colby jack classic shredded colby is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Good & gather colby jack classic shredded colby and Low fat yogurt?

There is a difference of 312 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.