Gourmet natural asian sesame dressing and marinade by low carb vs Starburst Jellybeans
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Gourmet natural asian sesame dressing and marinade by low carb
Starburst Jellybeans
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Gourmet natural asian sesame dressing and marinade by low carb and Starburst Jellybeans side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
Gourmet natural asian sesame dressing and marinade by low carb is the more energy-dense option here, packing 76 more calories per 100g than Starburst Jellybeans. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
In terms of sugar control, Gourmet natural asian sesame dressing and marinade by low carb takes the lead with only 16.666666666667g of sugar per 100g, whereas Starburst Jellybeans contains 67.857142857143g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.
Looking to build muscle? Gourmet natural asian sesame dressing and marinade by low carb offers a protein boost with 3.3333333333333g per 100g, outperforming Starburst Jellybeans in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Gourmet natural asian sesame dressing and marinade by low carb or Starburst Jellybeans?
It depends on your goals. Gourmet natural asian sesame dressing and marinade by low carb has 433.33333333333 calories, while Starburst Jellybeans has 357.14285714286 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Gourmet natural asian sesame dressing and marinade by low carb vegan?
No, Gourmet natural asian sesame dressing and marinade by low carb is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Gourmet natural asian sesame dressing and marinade by low carb and Starburst Jellybeans?
There is a difference of 76 calories per 100g between the two products.
