Head-to-Head Analysis

Grace, soup mix, chicken, chicken vs Kale & Mushroom Lasagna

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Grace, soup mix, chicken, chicken

Grace, soup mix, chicken, chicken

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Kale & Mushroom Lasagna

Kale & Mushroom Lasagna

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
333 kcal
Energy
0 kcal
6.7g
Sugars
0g
0g
Fat
0g
13.3g
Protein
0g
12.2g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Grace, soup mix, chicken, chicken and Kale & Mushroom Lasagna side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Grace, soup mix, chicken, chicken is the more energy-dense option here, packing 333 more calories per 100g than Kale & Mushroom Lasagna. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Grace, soup mix, chicken, chicken contains significantly more sugar (6.67g) compared to the milder Kale & Mushroom Lasagna (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Kale & Mushroom Lasagna is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Grace, soup mix, chicken, chicken offers a protein boost with 13.33g per 100g, outperforming Kale & Mushroom Lasagna in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Grace, soup mix, chicken, chicken or Kale & Mushroom Lasagna?

It depends on your goals. Grace, soup mix, chicken, chicken has 333 calories, while Kale & Mushroom Lasagna has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Grace, soup mix, chicken, chicken vegan?

No, Grace, soup mix, chicken, chicken is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Grace, soup mix, chicken, chicken and Kale & Mushroom Lasagna?

There is a difference of 333 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.