Head-to-Head Analysis

Grass Fed And Finished Natural Ground Beef Patties vs Original Sea Salt Kettle Cooked Potato Chips

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Grass Fed And Finished Natural Ground Beef Patties

Grass Fed And Finished Natural Ground Beef Patties

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Original Sea Salt Kettle Cooked Potato Chips

Original Sea Salt Kettle Cooked Potato Chips

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
214 kcal
Energy
536 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
15.2g
Fat
35.7g
18.8g
Protein
7.1g
0.2g
Salt
0.8g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Grass Fed And Finished Natural Ground Beef Patties and Original Sea Salt Kettle Cooked Potato Chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Grass Fed And Finished Natural Ground Beef Patties is the clear winner. With 322 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

Looking to build muscle? Grass Fed And Finished Natural Ground Beef Patties offers a protein boost with 18.8g per 100g, outperforming Original Sea Salt Kettle Cooked Potato Chips in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Grass Fed And Finished Natural Ground Beef Patties or Original Sea Salt Kettle Cooked Potato Chips?

It depends on your goals. Grass Fed And Finished Natural Ground Beef Patties has 214 calories, while Original Sea Salt Kettle Cooked Potato Chips has 536 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Grass Fed And Finished Natural Ground Beef Patties vegan?

No, Grass Fed And Finished Natural Ground Beef Patties is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Grass Fed And Finished Natural Ground Beef Patties and Original Sea Salt Kettle Cooked Potato Chips?

There is a difference of 322 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.