Head-to-Head Analysis

Grass Fed Beef Jerky vs Blue Diamond Almonds Wasabi & Soy Sauce

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Grass Fed Beef Jerky

Grass Fed Beef Jerky

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Blue Diamond Almonds Wasabi & Soy Sauce

Blue Diamond Almonds Wasabi & Soy Sauce

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
285.7 kcal
Energy
605 kcal
21.4g
Sugars
4.7g
3.6g
Fat
53.5g
39.3g
Protein
18.6g
4.6g
Salt
1.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Grass Fed Beef Jerky and Blue Diamond Almonds Wasabi & Soy Sauce side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Grass Fed Beef Jerky is the clear winner. With 319 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Grass Fed Beef Jerky contains significantly more sugar (21.428571428571g) compared to the milder Blue Diamond Almonds Wasabi & Soy Sauce (4.65g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Blue Diamond Almonds Wasabi & Soy Sauce is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Grass Fed Beef Jerky offers a protein boost with 39.285714285714g per 100g, outperforming Blue Diamond Almonds Wasabi & Soy Sauce in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Grass Fed Beef Jerky or Blue Diamond Almonds Wasabi & Soy Sauce?

It depends on your goals. Grass Fed Beef Jerky has 285.71428571429 calories, while Blue Diamond Almonds Wasabi & Soy Sauce has 605 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Grass Fed Beef Jerky vegan?

No, Grass Fed Beef Jerky is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Grass Fed Beef Jerky and Blue Diamond Almonds Wasabi & Soy Sauce?

There is a difference of 319 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.