Head-to-Head Analysis

Grass-Fed Beef Jerky Mango Habanero vs Chicken Fried Rice

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Grass-Fed Beef Jerky Mango Habanero

Grass-Fed Beef Jerky Mango Habanero

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Chicken Fried Rice

Chicken Fried Rice

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
214 kcal
Energy
180.6 kcal
17.9g
Sugars
1.3g
1.8g
Fat
4.8g
32.1g
Protein
4.8g
1.5g
Salt
1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Grass-Fed Beef Jerky Mango Habanero and Chicken Fried Rice side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Grass-Fed Beef Jerky Mango Habanero is the more energy-dense option here, packing 33 more calories per 100g than Chicken Fried Rice. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Grass-Fed Beef Jerky Mango Habanero contains significantly more sugar (17.9g) compared to the milder Chicken Fried Rice (1.3215859030837g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Chicken Fried Rice is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Grass-Fed Beef Jerky Mango Habanero offers a protein boost with 32.1g per 100g, outperforming Chicken Fried Rice in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Grass-Fed Beef Jerky Mango Habanero or Chicken Fried Rice?

It depends on your goals. Grass-Fed Beef Jerky Mango Habanero has 214 calories, while Chicken Fried Rice has 180.61674008811 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Grass-Fed Beef Jerky Mango Habanero vegan?

No, Grass-Fed Beef Jerky Mango Habanero is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Grass-Fed Beef Jerky Mango Habanero and Chicken Fried Rice?

There is a difference of 33 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.