Head-to-Head Analysis

Grass-Fed Beef Jerky Mango Habanero vs Original Premium Sausage

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Grass-Fed Beef Jerky Mango Habanero

Grass-Fed Beef Jerky Mango Habanero

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Original Premium Sausage

Original Premium Sausage

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
214 kcal
Energy
294 kcal
17.9g
Sugars
2.4g
1.8g
Fat
23.5g
32.1g
Protein
14.7g
1.5g
Salt
1.8g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Grass-Fed Beef Jerky Mango Habanero and Original Premium Sausage side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Grass-Fed Beef Jerky Mango Habanero is the clear winner. With 80 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Grass-Fed Beef Jerky Mango Habanero contains significantly more sugar (17.9g) compared to the milder Original Premium Sausage (2.35g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Original Premium Sausage is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Grass-Fed Beef Jerky Mango Habanero offers a protein boost with 32.1g per 100g, outperforming Original Premium Sausage in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Grass-Fed Beef Jerky Mango Habanero or Original Premium Sausage?

It depends on your goals. Grass-Fed Beef Jerky Mango Habanero has 214 calories, while Original Premium Sausage has 294 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Grass-Fed Beef Jerky Mango Habanero vegan?

No, Grass-Fed Beef Jerky Mango Habanero is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Grass-Fed Beef Jerky Mango Habanero and Original Premium Sausage?

There is a difference of 80 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.