Head-to-Head Analysis

Grass-Fed Beef Jerky Mango Habanero vs Chili & Lime Peanuts

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Grass-Fed Beef Jerky Mango Habanero

Grass-Fed Beef Jerky Mango Habanero

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Chili & Lime Peanuts

Chili & Lime Peanuts

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
765 kcal
Energy
533 kcal
63.8g
Sugars
3.3g
6.4g
Fat
46.7g
115g
Protein
23.3g
5.4g
Salt
3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Grass-Fed Beef Jerky Mango Habanero and Chili & Lime Peanuts side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Grass-Fed Beef Jerky Mango Habanero is the more energy-dense option here, packing 232 more calories per 100g than Chili & Lime Peanuts. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Grass-Fed Beef Jerky Mango Habanero contains significantly more sugar (63.8g) compared to the milder Chili & Lime Peanuts (3.33g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Chili & Lime Peanuts is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Grass-Fed Beef Jerky Mango Habanero offers a protein boost with 115g per 100g, outperforming Chili & Lime Peanuts in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Grass-Fed Beef Jerky Mango Habanero or Chili & Lime Peanuts?

It depends on your goals. Grass-Fed Beef Jerky Mango Habanero has 765 calories, while Chili & Lime Peanuts has 533 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Grass-Fed Beef Jerky Mango Habanero vegan?

No, Grass-Fed Beef Jerky Mango Habanero is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Grass-Fed Beef Jerky Mango Habanero and Chili & Lime Peanuts?

There is a difference of 232 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.