Head-to-Head Analysis

Grass-Fed Beef Jerky Spicy Sesame Garlic vs Chopped Pork and Ham

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Grass-Fed Beef Jerky Spicy Sesame Garlic

Grass-Fed Beef Jerky Spicy Sesame Garlic

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Chopped Pork and Ham

Chopped Pork and Ham

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
250 kcal
Energy
292 kcal
0g
Sugars
1.3g
8.9g
Fat
24.3g
39.3g
Protein
15g
2.5g
Salt
2.4g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Grass-Fed Beef Jerky Spicy Sesame Garlic and Chopped Pork and Ham side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Grass-Fed Beef Jerky Spicy Sesame Garlic is the clear winner. With 42 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Grass-Fed Beef Jerky Spicy Sesame Garlic takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Chopped Pork and Ham contains 1.3g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Grass-Fed Beef Jerky Spicy Sesame Garlic offers a protein boost with 39.3g per 100g, outperforming Chopped Pork and Ham in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Grass-Fed Beef Jerky Spicy Sesame Garlic or Chopped Pork and Ham?

Grass-Fed Beef Jerky Spicy Sesame Garlic appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Grass-Fed Beef Jerky Spicy Sesame Garlic vegan?

No, Grass-Fed Beef Jerky Spicy Sesame Garlic is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Grass-Fed Beef Jerky Spicy Sesame Garlic and Chopped Pork and Ham?

There is a difference of 42 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.