Grass-Fed Beef Sirloin vs California coast mixed nuts
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Grass-Fed Beef Sirloin
California coast mixed nuts
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Grass-Fed Beef Sirloin and California coast mixed nuts side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Grass-Fed Beef Sirloin is the clear winner. With 357 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
In terms of sugar control, Grass-Fed Beef Sirloin takes the lead with only 1.19g of sugar per 100g, whereas California coast mixed nuts contains 23.33g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.
Looking to build muscle? Grass-Fed Beef Sirloin offers a protein boost with 22.6g per 100g, outperforming California coast mixed nuts in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Grass-Fed Beef Sirloin or California coast mixed nuts?
Grass-Fed Beef Sirloin appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.
Is Grass-Fed Beef Sirloin vegan?
No, Grass-Fed Beef Sirloin is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Grass-Fed Beef Sirloin and California coast mixed nuts?
There is a difference of 357 calories per 100g between the two products.
