Head-to-Head Analysis

Grass Fed Ground Beef 93/7 vs Krinkle cut

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Grass Fed Ground Beef 93/7

Grass Fed Ground Beef 93/7

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Krinkle cut

Krinkle cut

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
152 kcal
Energy
500 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
7.1g
Fat
28.6g
20.5g
Protein
7.1g
0.2g
Salt
1.4g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Grass Fed Ground Beef 93/7 and Krinkle cut side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Grass Fed Ground Beef 93/7 is the clear winner. With 348 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

Looking to build muscle? Grass Fed Ground Beef 93/7 offers a protein boost with 20.5g per 100g, outperforming Krinkle cut in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Grass Fed Ground Beef 93/7 or Krinkle cut?

It depends on your goals. Grass Fed Ground Beef 93/7 has 152 calories, while Krinkle cut has 500 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Grass Fed Ground Beef 93/7 vegan?

No, Grass Fed Ground Beef 93/7 is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Grass Fed Ground Beef 93/7 and Krinkle cut?

There is a difference of 348 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.