Head-to-Head Analysis

Grass-fed Ground Lamb vs Sweet potato tortilla chips

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Grass-fed Ground Lamb

Grass-fed Ground Lamb

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Sweet potato tortilla chips

Sweet potato tortilla chips

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
214 kcal
Energy
500 kcal
0g
Sugars
3.6g
16.1g
Fat
25g
17.9g
Protein
7.1g
0.2g
Salt
0.9g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Grass-fed Ground Lamb and Sweet potato tortilla chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Grass-fed Ground Lamb is the clear winner. With 286 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Grass-fed Ground Lamb takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Sweet potato tortilla chips contains 3.57g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Grass-fed Ground Lamb offers a protein boost with 17.9g per 100g, outperforming Sweet potato tortilla chips in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Grass-fed Ground Lamb or Sweet potato tortilla chips?

Grass-fed Ground Lamb appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Grass-fed Ground Lamb vegan?

No, Grass-fed Ground Lamb is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Grass-fed Ground Lamb and Sweet potato tortilla chips?

There is a difference of 286 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.