Head-to-Head Analysis

Grass Fed Whey Isolate Native Irish Protein vs Starbucks chocolaty cookie straws

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Grass Fed Whey Isolate Native Irish Protein

Grass Fed Whey Isolate Native Irish Protein

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Starbucks chocolaty cookie straws

Starbucks chocolaty cookie straws

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
360 kcal
Energy
462 kcal
0g
Sugars
46.2g
0g
Fat
15.4g
92g
Protein
7.7g
0.4g
Salt
0.4g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Grass Fed Whey Isolate Native Irish Protein and Starbucks chocolaty cookie straws side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Grass Fed Whey Isolate Native Irish Protein is the clear winner. With 102 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Grass Fed Whey Isolate Native Irish Protein takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Starbucks chocolaty cookie straws contains 46.2g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Grass Fed Whey Isolate Native Irish Protein offers a protein boost with 92g per 100g, outperforming Starbucks chocolaty cookie straws in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Grass Fed Whey Isolate Native Irish Protein or Starbucks chocolaty cookie straws?

Grass Fed Whey Isolate Native Irish Protein appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Grass Fed Whey Isolate Native Irish Protein vegan?

No, Grass Fed Whey Isolate Native Irish Protein is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Grass Fed Whey Isolate Native Irish Protein and Starbucks chocolaty cookie straws?

There is a difference of 102 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.