Head-to-Head Analysis

Great Value Frozen Wild Caught Pacific Whiting Skin-On Fillets, 2 lb vs Branzino filets

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Great Value Frozen Wild Caught Pacific Whiting Skin-On Fillets, 2 lb

Great Value Frozen Wild Caught Pacific Whiting Skin-On Fillets, 2 lb

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Branzino filets

Branzino filets

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
100 kcal
Energy
97.3 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
1.5g
Fat
2.2g
21g
Protein
18.6g
0.2g
Salt
0.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Great Value Frozen Wild Caught Pacific Whiting Skin-On Fillets, 2 lb and Branzino filets side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Great Value Frozen Wild Caught Pacific Whiting Skin-On Fillets, 2 lb is the more energy-dense option here, packing 3 more calories per 100g than Branzino filets. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

Looking to build muscle? Great Value Frozen Wild Caught Pacific Whiting Skin-On Fillets, 2 lb offers a protein boost with 21g per 100g, outperforming Branzino filets in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Great Value Frozen Wild Caught Pacific Whiting Skin-On Fillets, 2 lb or Branzino filets?

It depends on your goals. Great Value Frozen Wild Caught Pacific Whiting Skin-On Fillets, 2 lb has 100 calories, while Branzino filets has 97.3 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Great Value Frozen Wild Caught Pacific Whiting Skin-On Fillets, 2 lb vegan?

No, Great Value Frozen Wild Caught Pacific Whiting Skin-On Fillets, 2 lb is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Great Value Frozen Wild Caught Pacific Whiting Skin-On Fillets, 2 lb and Branzino filets?

There is a difference of 3 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.