Head-to-Head Analysis

Great value, honey mustard dressing & dip, tangy vs Beef stew seasoning mix

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Great value, honey mustard dressing & dip, tangy

Great value, honey mustard dressing & dip, tangy

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Beef stew seasoning mix

Beef stew seasoning mix

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
433 kcal
Energy
15 kcal
20g
Sugars
0.5g
36.7g
Fat
0g
0g
Protein
0g
1.8g
Salt
1.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Great value, honey mustard dressing & dip, tangy and Beef stew seasoning mix side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Great value, honey mustard dressing & dip, tangy is the more energy-dense option here, packing 418 more calories per 100g than Beef stew seasoning mix. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Great value, honey mustard dressing & dip, tangy contains significantly more sugar (20g) compared to the milder Beef stew seasoning mix (0.5g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Beef stew seasoning mix is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Great value, honey mustard dressing & dip, tangy or Beef stew seasoning mix?

It depends on your goals. Great value, honey mustard dressing & dip, tangy has 433 calories, while Beef stew seasoning mix has 15 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Great value, honey mustard dressing & dip, tangy vegan?

No, Great value, honey mustard dressing & dip, tangy is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Great value, honey mustard dressing & dip, tangy and Beef stew seasoning mix?

There is a difference of 418 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.