Head-to-Head Analysis

Great value, nonfat instant dry milk vs Organic Tomato Paste

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Great value, nonfat instant dry milk

Great value, nonfat instant dry milk

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Organic Tomato Paste

Organic Tomato Paste

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
348 kcal
Energy
75.8 kcal
52.2g
Sugars
12.1g
0g
Fat
0g
34.8g
Protein
3g
1.4g
Salt
0.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Great value, nonfat instant dry milk and Organic Tomato Paste side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Great value, nonfat instant dry milk is the more energy-dense option here, packing 272 more calories per 100g than Organic Tomato Paste. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Great value, nonfat instant dry milk contains significantly more sugar (52.17g) compared to the milder Organic Tomato Paste (12.1g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Organic Tomato Paste is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Great value, nonfat instant dry milk offers a protein boost with 34.78g per 100g, outperforming Organic Tomato Paste in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Great value, nonfat instant dry milk or Organic Tomato Paste?

It depends on your goals. Great value, nonfat instant dry milk has 348 calories, while Organic Tomato Paste has 75.8 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Great value, nonfat instant dry milk vegan?

No, Great value, nonfat instant dry milk is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Great value, nonfat instant dry milk and Organic Tomato Paste?

There is a difference of 272 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.