Head-to-Head Analysis

Greens vs ISO 100 hydrolized protein powder

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Greens

Greens

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of ISO 100 hydrolized protein powder

ISO 100 hydrolized protein powder

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
312 kcal
Energy
367 kcal
12.5g
Sugars
3.3g
0g
Fat
0g
12.5g
Protein
83.3g
0.9g
Salt
0.6g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Greens and ISO 100 hydrolized protein powder side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Greens is the clear winner. With 55 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Greens contains significantly more sugar (12.5g) compared to the milder ISO 100 hydrolized protein powder (3.33g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, ISO 100 hydrolized protein powder is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Greens or ISO 100 hydrolized protein powder?

It depends on your goals. Greens has 312 calories, while ISO 100 hydrolized protein powder has 367 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Greens vegan?

No, Greens is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Greens and ISO 100 hydrolized protein powder?

There is a difference of 55 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.