Head-to-Head Analysis

Grilled Chicken Caesar Bowl With Creamy Caesar Dressing vs Salted with sea salt pistachios

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Grilled Chicken Caesar Bowl With Creamy Caesar Dressing

Grilled Chicken Caesar Bowl With Creamy Caesar Dressing

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Salted with sea salt pistachios

Salted with sea salt pistachios

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
179 kcal
Energy
170.1 kcal
1.1g
Sugars
2g
13g
Fat
14g
10.3g
Protein
6g
1.1g
Salt
0.4g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Grilled Chicken Caesar Bowl With Creamy Caesar Dressing and Salted with sea salt pistachios side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Grilled Chicken Caesar Bowl With Creamy Caesar Dressing is the more energy-dense option here, packing 9 more calories per 100g than Salted with sea salt pistachios. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

Looking to build muscle? Grilled Chicken Caesar Bowl With Creamy Caesar Dressing offers a protein boost with 10.3g per 100g, outperforming Salted with sea salt pistachios in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Grilled Chicken Caesar Bowl With Creamy Caesar Dressing or Salted with sea salt pistachios?

It depends on your goals. Grilled Chicken Caesar Bowl With Creamy Caesar Dressing has 179 calories, while Salted with sea salt pistachios has 170.1 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Grilled Chicken Caesar Bowl With Creamy Caesar Dressing vegan?

No, Grilled Chicken Caesar Bowl With Creamy Caesar Dressing is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Grilled Chicken Caesar Bowl With Creamy Caesar Dressing and Salted with sea salt pistachios?

There is a difference of 9 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.