Head-to-Head Analysis

Ground Beef Sirloin vs Chia Squeeze Vitality Snack Blackberry Bliss

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Ground Beef Sirloin

Ground Beef Sirloin

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Chia Squeeze Vitality Snack Blackberry Bliss

Chia Squeeze Vitality Snack Blackberry Bliss

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
133.9 kcal
Energy
71.4 kcal
0g
Sugars
5.1g
3.6g
Fat
2.6g
21.4g
Protein
2g
0.2g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Ground Beef Sirloin and Chia Squeeze Vitality Snack Blackberry Bliss side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Ground Beef Sirloin is the more energy-dense option here, packing 63 more calories per 100g than Chia Squeeze Vitality Snack Blackberry Bliss. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Ground Beef Sirloin takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Chia Squeeze Vitality Snack Blackberry Bliss contains 5.1g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Ground Beef Sirloin offers a protein boost with 21.4285714285714g per 100g, outperforming Chia Squeeze Vitality Snack Blackberry Bliss in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Ground Beef Sirloin or Chia Squeeze Vitality Snack Blackberry Bliss?

It depends on your goals. Ground Beef Sirloin has 133.928571428571 calories, while Chia Squeeze Vitality Snack Blackberry Bliss has 71.4 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Ground Beef Sirloin vegan?

No, Ground Beef Sirloin is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Ground Beef Sirloin and Chia Squeeze Vitality Snack Blackberry Bliss?

There is a difference of 63 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.