Ground Chuck vs Ritz Crackers
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Ground Chuck
Ritz Crackers
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Ground Chuck and Ritz Crackers side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Ground Chuck is the clear winner. With 250 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
In terms of sugar control, Ground Chuck takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Ritz Crackers contains 6.25g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.
Looking to build muscle? Ground Chuck offers a protein boost with 17g per 100g, outperforming Ritz Crackers in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Ground Chuck or Ritz Crackers?
Ground Chuck appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.
Is Ground Chuck vegan?
No, Ground Chuck is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Ground Chuck and Ritz Crackers?
There is a difference of 250 calories per 100g between the two products.
