Ground Chuck 100 80 vs anafaf
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Ground Chuck 100 80
anafaf
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Ground Chuck 100 80 and anafaf side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
Ground Chuck 100 80 is the more energy-dense option here, packing 239 more calories per 100g than anafaf. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
In terms of sugar control, Ground Chuck 100 80 takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas anafaf contains 11g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.
Looking to build muscle? Ground Chuck 100 80 offers a protein boost with 17g per 100g, outperforming anafaf in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Ground Chuck 100 80 or anafaf?
It depends on your goals. Ground Chuck 100 80 has 250 calories, while anafaf has 11 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Ground Chuck 100 80 vegan?
No, Ground Chuck 100 80 is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Ground Chuck 100 80 and anafaf?
There is a difference of 239 calories per 100g between the two products.
