GSM De-Alcoholized Red Wine vs Triscuit Cracker
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
GSM De-Alcoholized Red Wine
Triscuit Cracker
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing GSM De-Alcoholized Red Wine and Triscuit Cracker side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, GSM De-Alcoholized Red Wine is the clear winner. With 410 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
However, watch out for the sugar content. GSM De-Alcoholized Red Wine contains significantly more sugar (4.27g) compared to the milder Triscuit Cracker (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Triscuit Cracker is undeniably the healthier pick.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: GSM De-Alcoholized Red Wine or Triscuit Cracker?
It depends on your goals. GSM De-Alcoholized Red Wine has 19.2 calories, while Triscuit Cracker has 429 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is GSM De-Alcoholized Red Wine vegan?
No, GSM De-Alcoholized Red Wine is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between GSM De-Alcoholized Red Wine and Triscuit Cracker?
There is a difference of 410 calories per 100g between the two products.
