Head-to-Head Analysis

Gummi Strawberries vs classic chili lime flavored potato chips

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Gummi Strawberries

Gummi Strawberries

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of classic chili lime flavored potato chips

classic chili lime flavored potato chips

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
367 kcal
Energy
0 kcal
46.7g
Sugars
0g
0g
Fat
0g
6.7g
Protein
0g
0g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Gummi Strawberries and classic chili lime flavored potato chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Gummi Strawberries is the more energy-dense option here, packing 367 more calories per 100g than classic chili lime flavored potato chips. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Gummi Strawberries contains significantly more sugar (46.7g) compared to the milder classic chili lime flavored potato chips (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, classic chili lime flavored potato chips is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Gummi Strawberries offers a protein boost with 6.67g per 100g, outperforming classic chili lime flavored potato chips in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Gummi Strawberries or classic chili lime flavored potato chips?

It depends on your goals. Gummi Strawberries has 367 calories, while classic chili lime flavored potato chips has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Gummi Strawberries vegan?

No, Gummi Strawberries is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Gummi Strawberries and classic chili lime flavored potato chips?

There is a difference of 367 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.