Head-to-Head Analysis

Gummy Busters vs Sweet Fish

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Gummy Busters

Gummy Busters

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Sweet Fish

Sweet Fish

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
233 kcal
Energy
0 kcal
33.3g
Sugars
0g
0g
Fat
0g
0g
Protein
0g
0g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Gummy Busters and Sweet Fish side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Gummy Busters is the more energy-dense option here, packing 233 more calories per 100g than Sweet Fish. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Gummy Busters contains significantly more sugar (33.3g) compared to the milder Sweet Fish (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Sweet Fish is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Gummy Busters or Sweet Fish?

It depends on your goals. Gummy Busters has 233 calories, while Sweet Fish has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Gummy Busters vegan?

No, Gummy Busters is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Gummy Busters and Sweet Fish?

There is a difference of 233 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.