Head-to-Head Analysis

Hair, Skin & Nails Gummies vs ORVILLE REDENBACHERS Smart Pop Butter Popcorn, 39.49 OZ

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Hair, Skin & Nails Gummies

Hair, Skin & Nails Gummies

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of ORVILLE REDENBACHERS Smart Pop Butter Popcorn, 39.49 OZ

ORVILLE REDENBACHERS Smart Pop Butter Popcorn, 39.49 OZ

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
15 kcal
Energy
500 kcal
2g
Sugars
0g
0g
Fat
32.4g
0g
Protein
5.9g
0g
Salt
3.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Hair, Skin & Nails Gummies and ORVILLE REDENBACHERS Smart Pop Butter Popcorn, 39.49 OZ side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Hair, Skin & Nails Gummies is the clear winner. With 485 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Hair, Skin & Nails Gummies contains significantly more sugar (2g) compared to the milder ORVILLE REDENBACHERS Smart Pop Butter Popcorn, 39.49 OZ (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, ORVILLE REDENBACHERS Smart Pop Butter Popcorn, 39.49 OZ is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Hair, Skin & Nails Gummies or ORVILLE REDENBACHERS Smart Pop Butter Popcorn, 39.49 OZ?

It depends on your goals. Hair, Skin & Nails Gummies has 15 calories, while ORVILLE REDENBACHERS Smart Pop Butter Popcorn, 39.49 OZ has 500 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Hair, Skin & Nails Gummies vegan?

No, Hair, Skin & Nails Gummies is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Hair, Skin & Nails Gummies and ORVILLE REDENBACHERS Smart Pop Butter Popcorn, 39.49 OZ?

There is a difference of 485 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.