Head-to-Head Analysis

Halvah marble king size vs ROC Rice Cake Thins, Salt Free

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Halvah marble king size

Halvah marble king size

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of ROC Rice Cake Thins, Salt Free

ROC Rice Cake Thins, Salt Free

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
523.8 kcal
Energy
357 kcal
19g
Sugars
0g
31g
Fat
0g
16.7g
Protein
7.1g
0.6g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Halvah marble king size and ROC Rice Cake Thins, Salt Free side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Halvah marble king size is the more energy-dense option here, packing 167 more calories per 100g than ROC Rice Cake Thins, Salt Free. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Halvah marble king size contains significantly more sugar (19.047619047619g) compared to the milder ROC Rice Cake Thins, Salt Free (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, ROC Rice Cake Thins, Salt Free is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Halvah marble king size offers a protein boost with 16.666666666667g per 100g, outperforming ROC Rice Cake Thins, Salt Free in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Halvah marble king size or ROC Rice Cake Thins, Salt Free?

It depends on your goals. Halvah marble king size has 523.80952380952 calories, while ROC Rice Cake Thins, Salt Free has 357 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Halvah marble king size vegan?

No, Halvah marble king size is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Halvah marble king size and ROC Rice Cake Thins, Salt Free?

There is a difference of 167 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.