Ham vs California Mission Figs
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Ham
California Mission Figs
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Ham and California Mission Figs side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Ham is the clear winner. With 125 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
In terms of sugar control, Ham takes the lead with only 5.36g of sugar per 100g, whereas California Mission Figs contains 47.5g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.
Looking to build muscle? Ham offers a protein boost with 17.9g per 100g, outperforming California Mission Figs in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Ham or California Mission Figs?
Ham appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.
Is Ham vegan?
No, Ham is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Ham and California Mission Figs?
There is a difference of 125 calories per 100g between the two products.
