Ham vs emily's dark chocolate covered blueberries
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Ham
emily's dark chocolate covered blueberries
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Ham and emily's dark chocolate covered blueberries side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Ham is the clear winner. With 9 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
In terms of sugar control, Ham takes the lead with only 1.79g of sugar per 100g, whereas emily's dark chocolate covered blueberries contains 22g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.
Looking to build muscle? Ham offers a protein boost with 16.1g per 100g, outperforming emily's dark chocolate covered blueberries in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Ham or emily's dark chocolate covered blueberries?
Ham appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.
Is Ham vegan?
No, Ham is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Ham and emily's dark chocolate covered blueberries?
There is a difference of 9 calories per 100g between the two products.
