Head-to-Head Analysis

Ham vs Nabisco newtons lunchbox cookies fig fat free1x2.1 oz

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Ham

Ham

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Nabisco newtons lunchbox cookies fig fat free1x2.1 oz

Nabisco newtons lunchbox cookies fig fat free1x2.1 oz

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
118 kcal
Energy
345 kcal
1.2g
Sugars
37.9g
4.7g
Fat
5.2g
17.6g
Protein
0g
3.3g
Salt
0.9g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Ham and Nabisco newtons lunchbox cookies fig fat free1x2.1 oz side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Ham is the clear winner. With 227 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Ham takes the lead with only 1.18g of sugar per 100g, whereas Nabisco newtons lunchbox cookies fig fat free1x2.1 oz contains 37.9g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Ham offers a protein boost with 17.6g per 100g, outperforming Nabisco newtons lunchbox cookies fig fat free1x2.1 oz in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Ham or Nabisco newtons lunchbox cookies fig fat free1x2.1 oz?

Ham appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Ham vegan?

No, Ham is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Ham and Nabisco newtons lunchbox cookies fig fat free1x2.1 oz?

There is a difference of 227 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.