Ham and swiss pockets vs Coleslaw dressing
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Ham and swiss pockets
Coleslaw dressing
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Ham and swiss pockets and Coleslaw dressing side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
Ham and swiss pockets is the more energy-dense option here, packing 364 more calories per 100g than Coleslaw dressing. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
However, watch out for the sugar content. Ham and swiss pockets contains significantly more sugar (5.56g) compared to the milder Coleslaw dressing (0.09g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Coleslaw dressing is undeniably the healthier pick.
Looking to build muscle? Ham and swiss pockets offers a protein boost with 13.3g per 100g, outperforming Coleslaw dressing in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Ham and swiss pockets or Coleslaw dressing?
It depends on your goals. Ham and swiss pockets has 378 calories, while Coleslaw dressing has 14 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Ham and swiss pockets vegan?
No, Ham and swiss pockets is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Ham and swiss pockets and Coleslaw dressing?
There is a difference of 364 calories per 100g between the two products.
