Head-to-Head Analysis

Ham & Swiss on a Pretzel Roll vs Mr Beast Bar- Original Chocolate

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Ham & Swiss on a Pretzel Roll

Ham & Swiss on a Pretzel Roll

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Mr Beast Bar- Original Chocolate

Mr Beast Bar- Original Chocolate

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
390 kcal
Energy
567 kcal
10g
Sugars
0g
10g
Fat
33.3g
21g
Protein
3.3g
3.5g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Ham & Swiss on a Pretzel Roll and Mr Beast Bar- Original Chocolate side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Ham & Swiss on a Pretzel Roll is the clear winner. With 177 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Ham & Swiss on a Pretzel Roll contains significantly more sugar (10g) compared to the milder Mr Beast Bar- Original Chocolate (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Mr Beast Bar- Original Chocolate is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Ham & Swiss on a Pretzel Roll offers a protein boost with 21g per 100g, outperforming Mr Beast Bar- Original Chocolate in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Ham & Swiss on a Pretzel Roll or Mr Beast Bar- Original Chocolate?

It depends on your goals. Ham & Swiss on a Pretzel Roll has 390 calories, while Mr Beast Bar- Original Chocolate has 567 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Ham & Swiss on a Pretzel Roll vegan?

No, Ham & Swiss on a Pretzel Roll is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Ham & Swiss on a Pretzel Roll and Mr Beast Bar- Original Chocolate?

There is a difference of 177 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.