Head-to-Head Analysis

Hardwood Slow Smoked Beef Lil'Smokies vs Snyder's of hanover pretzel sticks

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Hardwood Slow Smoked Beef Lil'Smokies

Hardwood Slow Smoked Beef Lil'Smokies

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Snyder's of hanover pretzel sticks

Snyder's of hanover pretzel sticks

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
250 kcal
Energy
428.6 kcal
1.8g
Sugars
7.1g
19.6g
Fat
17.9g
14.3g
Protein
0g
1.6g
Salt
2.9g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Hardwood Slow Smoked Beef Lil'Smokies and Snyder's of hanover pretzel sticks side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Hardwood Slow Smoked Beef Lil'Smokies is the clear winner. With 179 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Hardwood Slow Smoked Beef Lil'Smokies takes the lead with only 1.7857142857143g of sugar per 100g, whereas Snyder's of hanover pretzel sticks contains 7.1429g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Hardwood Slow Smoked Beef Lil'Smokies offers a protein boost with 14.285714285714g per 100g, outperforming Snyder's of hanover pretzel sticks in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Hardwood Slow Smoked Beef Lil'Smokies or Snyder's of hanover pretzel sticks?

Hardwood Slow Smoked Beef Lil'Smokies appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Hardwood Slow Smoked Beef Lil'Smokies vegan?

No, Hardwood Slow Smoked Beef Lil'Smokies is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Hardwood Slow Smoked Beef Lil'Smokies and Snyder's of hanover pretzel sticks?

There is a difference of 179 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.