Head-to-Head Analysis

Hardwood Smoked Pitmaster Seasoned Pulled Pork vs 85% Cacao Dark Chocolate

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Hardwood Smoked Pitmaster Seasoned Pulled Pork

Hardwood Smoked Pitmaster Seasoned Pulled Pork

Not Vegan
VS
Package of 85% Cacao Dark Chocolate

85% Cacao Dark Chocolate

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
119 kcal
Energy
566.7 kcal
0g
Sugars
13.3g
5.4g
Fat
50g
15.5g
Protein
10g
1.3g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Hardwood Smoked Pitmaster Seasoned Pulled Pork and 85% Cacao Dark Chocolate side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Hardwood Smoked Pitmaster Seasoned Pulled Pork is the clear winner. With 448 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Hardwood Smoked Pitmaster Seasoned Pulled Pork takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas 85% Cacao Dark Chocolate contains 13.33g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Hardwood Smoked Pitmaster Seasoned Pulled Pork offers a protein boost with 15.4761904761905g per 100g, outperforming 85% Cacao Dark Chocolate in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Hardwood Smoked Pitmaster Seasoned Pulled Pork or 85% Cacao Dark Chocolate?

Hardwood Smoked Pitmaster Seasoned Pulled Pork appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Hardwood Smoked Pitmaster Seasoned Pulled Pork vegan?

No, Hardwood Smoked Pitmaster Seasoned Pulled Pork is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Hardwood Smoked Pitmaster Seasoned Pulled Pork and 85% Cacao Dark Chocolate?

There is a difference of 448 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.