Head-to-Head Analysis

Hardy beef and vegetable soup vs Marconi, the original chicago style giardiniera, mild

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Hardy beef and vegetable soup

Hardy beef and vegetable soup

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Marconi, the original chicago style giardiniera, mild

Marconi, the original chicago style giardiniera, mild

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
43.9 kcal
Energy
429 kcal
1.3g
Sugars
7.1g
1.1g
Fat
42.9g
3.1g
Protein
0g
0.8g
Salt
1.7g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Hardy beef and vegetable soup and Marconi, the original chicago style giardiniera, mild side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Hardy beef and vegetable soup is the clear winner. With 385 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Hardy beef and vegetable soup takes the lead with only 1.32g of sugar per 100g, whereas Marconi, the original chicago style giardiniera, mild contains 7.14g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Hardy beef and vegetable soup offers a protein boost with 3.07g per 100g, outperforming Marconi, the original chicago style giardiniera, mild in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Hardy beef and vegetable soup or Marconi, the original chicago style giardiniera, mild?

Hardy beef and vegetable soup appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Hardy beef and vegetable soup vegan?

No, Hardy beef and vegetable soup is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Hardy beef and vegetable soup and Marconi, the original chicago style giardiniera, mild?

There is a difference of 385 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.