Head-to-Head Analysis

Harris teeter, smooth almond butter vs Organic Kidney Beans

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Harris teeter, smooth almond butter

Harris teeter, smooth almond butter

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Organic Kidney Beans

Organic Kidney Beans

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
667 kcal
Energy
77 kcal
3.3g
Sugars
0.8g
53.3g
Fat
0.4g
26.7g
Protein
5.4g
0g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Harris teeter, smooth almond butter and Organic Kidney Beans side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Harris teeter, smooth almond butter is the more energy-dense option here, packing 590 more calories per 100g than Organic Kidney Beans. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Harris teeter, smooth almond butter contains significantly more sugar (3.33g) compared to the milder Organic Kidney Beans (0.77g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Organic Kidney Beans is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Harris teeter, smooth almond butter offers a protein boost with 26.7g per 100g, outperforming Organic Kidney Beans in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Harris teeter, smooth almond butter or Organic Kidney Beans?

It depends on your goals. Harris teeter, smooth almond butter has 667 calories, while Organic Kidney Beans has 77 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Harris teeter, smooth almond butter vegan?

No, Harris teeter, smooth almond butter is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Harris teeter, smooth almond butter and Organic Kidney Beans?

There is a difference of 590 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.