Head-to-Head Analysis

HARVEST SNAPS WASABI RANCH BAKED GREEN PEA SNACKS vs Original

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of HARVEST SNAPS WASABI RANCH BAKED GREEN PEA SNACKS

HARVEST SNAPS WASABI RANCH BAKED GREEN PEA SNACKS

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Original

Original

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
464 kcal
Energy
500 kcal
3.6g
Sugars
0g
17.9g
Fat
26.7g
17.9g
Protein
10g
0.8g
Salt
1.9g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing HARVEST SNAPS WASABI RANCH BAKED GREEN PEA SNACKS and Original side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, HARVEST SNAPS WASABI RANCH BAKED GREEN PEA SNACKS is the clear winner. With 36 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. HARVEST SNAPS WASABI RANCH BAKED GREEN PEA SNACKS contains significantly more sugar (3.57g) compared to the milder Original (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Original is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? HARVEST SNAPS WASABI RANCH BAKED GREEN PEA SNACKS offers a protein boost with 17.9g per 100g, outperforming Original in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: HARVEST SNAPS WASABI RANCH BAKED GREEN PEA SNACKS or Original?

It depends on your goals. HARVEST SNAPS WASABI RANCH BAKED GREEN PEA SNACKS has 464 calories, while Original has 500 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is HARVEST SNAPS WASABI RANCH BAKED GREEN PEA SNACKS vegan?

No, HARVEST SNAPS WASABI RANCH BAKED GREEN PEA SNACKS is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between HARVEST SNAPS WASABI RANCH BAKED GREEN PEA SNACKS and Original?

There is a difference of 36 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.