Head-to-Head Analysis

Hawaiian-Style Chicken vs Flavored grains long grain & wild fast

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Hawaiian-Style Chicken

Hawaiian-Style Chicken

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Flavored grains long grain & wild fast

Flavored grains long grain & wild fast

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
114 kcal
Energy
323.1 kcal
6.4g
Sugars
1.5g
1.8g
Fat
1.5g
14.3g
Protein
9.2g
1.2g
Salt
2.6g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Hawaiian-Style Chicken and Flavored grains long grain & wild fast side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Hawaiian-Style Chicken is the clear winner. With 209 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Hawaiian-Style Chicken contains significantly more sugar (6.43g) compared to the milder Flavored grains long grain & wild fast (1.5384615384615g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Flavored grains long grain & wild fast is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Hawaiian-Style Chicken offers a protein boost with 14.3g per 100g, outperforming Flavored grains long grain & wild fast in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Hawaiian-Style Chicken or Flavored grains long grain & wild fast?

It depends on your goals. Hawaiian-Style Chicken has 114 calories, while Flavored grains long grain & wild fast has 323.07692307692 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Hawaiian-Style Chicken vegan?

No, Hawaiian-Style Chicken is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Hawaiian-Style Chicken and Flavored grains long grain & wild fast?

There is a difference of 209 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.