Head-to-Head Analysis

Hawaiian Sun Chocolate Covered Macadamia Nuts vs Chocolate cupcakes

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Hawaiian Sun Chocolate Covered Macadamia Nuts

Hawaiian Sun Chocolate Covered Macadamia Nuts

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Chocolate cupcakes

Chocolate cupcakes

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
486 kcal
Energy
367 kcal
0g
Sugars
45g
43.2g
Fat
11.7g
5.4g
Protein
3.3g
0g
Salt
1.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Hawaiian Sun Chocolate Covered Macadamia Nuts and Chocolate cupcakes side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Hawaiian Sun Chocolate Covered Macadamia Nuts is the more energy-dense option here, packing 119 more calories per 100g than Chocolate cupcakes. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Hawaiian Sun Chocolate Covered Macadamia Nuts takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Chocolate cupcakes contains 45g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Hawaiian Sun Chocolate Covered Macadamia Nuts offers a protein boost with 5.41g per 100g, outperforming Chocolate cupcakes in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Hawaiian Sun Chocolate Covered Macadamia Nuts or Chocolate cupcakes?

It depends on your goals. Hawaiian Sun Chocolate Covered Macadamia Nuts has 486 calories, while Chocolate cupcakes has 367 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Hawaiian Sun Chocolate Covered Macadamia Nuts vegan?

No, Hawaiian Sun Chocolate Covered Macadamia Nuts is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Hawaiian Sun Chocolate Covered Macadamia Nuts and Chocolate cupcakes?

There is a difference of 119 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.