Head-to-Head Analysis

Hawaiian Sweet Rolls vs Natural Brown Long Grain Rice

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Hawaiian Sweet Rolls

Hawaiian Sweet Rolls

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Natural Brown Long Grain Rice

Natural Brown Long Grain Rice

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
321 kcal
Energy
356 kcal
17.9g
Sugars
0g
7.1g
Fat
3.3g
10.7g
Protein
8.9g
0.7g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Hawaiian Sweet Rolls and Natural Brown Long Grain Rice side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Hawaiian Sweet Rolls is the clear winner. With 35 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Hawaiian Sweet Rolls contains significantly more sugar (17.9g) compared to the milder Natural Brown Long Grain Rice (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Natural Brown Long Grain Rice is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Hawaiian Sweet Rolls or Natural Brown Long Grain Rice?

It depends on your goals. Hawaiian Sweet Rolls has 321 calories, while Natural Brown Long Grain Rice has 356 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Hawaiian Sweet Rolls vegan?

No, Hawaiian Sweet Rolls is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Hawaiian Sweet Rolls and Natural Brown Long Grain Rice?

There is a difference of 35 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.